The handmaid's tale
Bookreader Item Preview
Share or Embed This Item
- Publication date
- 1985
- Publisher
- Toronto : McClelland and Stewart
- Collection
- printdisabled; internetarchivebooks; toronto; bannedbooks; bannedbooks
- Contributor
- Internet Archive
- Language
- English
- Access-restricted-item
- true
- Addeddate
- 2012-11-20 15:42:04
- Bookplateleaf
- 0004
- Boxid
- IA153607
- Camera
- Canon EOS 5D Mark II
- City
- Toronto
- Donor
- torontobookdrive
- Edition
- 2. print.
- External-identifier
-
urn:oclc:record:1035090131
- Foldoutcount
- 0
- Identifier
- handmaidstale00marg
- Identifier-ark
- ark:/13960/t9x07cx4w
- Isbn
- 0771008139
- Lccn
- 86129018
85021944
- Noindex
- true
- Ocr
- ABBYY FineReader 8.0
- Openlibrary
- OL2769393M
- Openlibrary_edition
- OL2769393M
- Openlibrary_subject
- openlibrary_staff_picks
- Openlibrary_work
- OL675783W
- Page-progression
- lr
- Pages
- 338
- Ppi
- 500
- Related-external-id
- urn:isbn:0771008791
urn:oclc:711936599
urn:oclc:808609987
urn:oclc:865339589
urn:isbn:0771008740
urn:oclc:70130759
urn:isbn:0395404258
urn:lccn:85021944
urn:oclc:12558693
urn:oclc:299767347
urn:oclc:300958985
urn:oclc:399699660
urn:oclc:429562333
urn:oclc:441123562
urn:oclc:473254757
urn:oclc:779349694
urn:oclc:805945163
urn:oclc:823780826
urn:oclc:837215246
urn:isbn:0449911535
urn:lccn:96096724
urn:oclc:316250860
urn:oclc:35712787
urn:oclc:803918875
urn:isbn:184159301X
urn:lccn:2006042618
urn:oclc:156916435
urn:oclc:70060187
urn:oclc:732687674
urn:oclc:77255194
urn:oclc:64592213
urn:oclc:750903795
urn:isbn:0099740915
urn:oclc:222816432
urn:oclc:255384358
urn:oclc:315960275
urn:oclc:39900946
urn:oclc:439834432
urn:oclc:469547307
urn:oclc:59619332
urn:oclc:633046190
urn:oclc:751036688
urn:oclc:757412823
urn:oclc:758069718
urn:oclc:759621004
urn:oclc:804132809
urn:oclc:808121355
urn:oclc:828160910
urn:oclc:828608213
urn:oclc:832720455
urn:oclc:855714947
urn:isbn:0099745011
urn:oclc:491189246
urn:isbn:0435124099
urn:oclc:490917710
urn:oclc:60056783
urn:oclc:813627707
urn:oclc:849890805
urn:oclc:850857786
urn:isbn:0770421156
urn:oclc:15102293
urn:oclc:301691265
urn:oclc:397737055
urn:oclc:441369313
urn:oclc:464121712
urn:oclc:803203328
urn:isbn:0547345666
urn:oclc:746765236
urn:oclc:772081234
urn:oclc:815762332
urn:isbn:081614172X
urn:lccn:86026960
urn:oclc:14520336
urn:oclc:229327049
urn:oclc:670134559
urn:oclc:786170213
urn:oclc:859003543
urn:oclc:632685151
urn:isbn:1551994968
urn:oclc:821602828
urn:oclc:858014851
urn:oclc:861653601
urn:isbn:1439501432
urn:oclc:863490178
urn:isbn:8788497909
urn:oclc:467047676
urn:oclc:60967062
urn:oclc:60990345
urn:oclc:874421552
urn:isbn:3125776937
urn:isbn:0606181245
urn:lccn:97042966
urn:oclc:37806202
urn:isbn:1853811742
urn:oclc:55563424
urn:oclc:15550668
urn:isbn:009949695X
urn:oclc:453906795
urn:oclc:476339154
urn:oclc:65338020
urn:oclc:851783270
urn:isbn:0770428207
urn:oclc:247953114
urn:oclc:42889140
urn:oclc:473477553
urn:oclc:56319244
urn:oclc:678621141
urn:oclc:678882652
urn:oclc:741372204
urn:oclc:751034529
urn:oclc:767865214
urn:oclc:796961028
urn:oclc:798972866
urn:oclc:855303867
urn:oclc:858050419
urn:isbn:0771008554
urn:oclc:40268310
urn:oclc:49843902
urn:oclc:644676670
urn:oclc:679752266
urn:oclc:750806370
urn:oclc:865449916
urn:isbn:0449212602
urn:oclc:15091789
urn:oclc:183733487
urn:oclc:223314590
urn:oclc:256204908
urn:oclc:256239023
urn:oclc:257212849
urn:oclc:283708906
urn:oclc:438393307
urn:oclc:468138734
urn:oclc:469889485
urn:oclc:478403394
urn:oclc:490174514
urn:oclc:68727837
urn:oclc:70994321
urn:oclc:749538208
urn:oclc:751034567
urn:oclc:801971252
urn:oclc:81984705
urn:oclc:868136661
urn:isbn:3125776929
urn:isbn:1408802953
urn:oclc:429601503
urn:isbn:0860688666
urn:oclc:224393097
urn:oclc:246673445
urn:oclc:249546528
urn:oclc:256075586
urn:oclc:271806830
urn:oclc:440193306
urn:oclc:489954427
urn:oclc:610775855
urn:oclc:611958700
urn:oclc:612997837
urn:oclc:751034519
urn:oclc:758088364
urn:oclc:769295904
urn:oclc:797065247
urn:oclc:807519511
urn:oclc:827732102
urn:isbn:0816141711
urn:isbn:0808598295
urn:oclc:427435172
urn:isbn:0224023489
urn:oclc:469862056
urn:oclc:490359938
urn:oclc:59207286
urn:oclc:611598919
urn:oclc:614082783
urn:oclc:855717347
urn:oclc:861530804
urn:oclc:876270485
urn:oclc:877133511
urn:isbn:0099563142
urn:oclc:747915585
urn:oclc:765624037
urn:isbn:0099511665
urn:oclc:645697569
urn:oclc:767759345
urn:oclc:781601535
urn:oclc:800545638
urn:isbn:0770422632
urn:lccn:86129018
urn:oclc:237138625
urn:oclc:488617235
urn:oclc:490961422
urn:oclc:631625011
urn:oclc:65886768
urn:oclc:751204286
urn:oclc:805724863
urn:oclc:829333801
urn:isbn:0307264602
urn:oclc:427331376
urn:isbn:038549081X
urn:oclc:248740880
urn:oclc:490101523
urn:oclc:709970635
urn:oclc:779349703
urn:oclc:833061206
urn:isbn:9990213194
urn:oclc:176919271
- Republisher_date
- 20121121153948
- Republisher_operator
- associate-gabriel-areay@archive.org
- Scandate
- 20121120174910
- Scanner
- scribe17.toronto.archive.org
- Scanningcenter
- uoft
- Source
- removedNEL
- Worldcat (source edition)
- 12825460
- Year
- 1985
- Full catalog record
- MARCXML
comment
Reviews
Reviewer:
Epub Ebooks
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
September 26, 2017
Subject: Have read it 3 times and still it amaze me
Subject: Have read it 3 times and still it amaze me
wow the book is really something else. it includes all genre from thrill to horror. Its just amazing. The plot, the ups the downs are really amazing. It looks so natural.
https://epubebooks.net/the-handmaid-tale-epub/
https://epubebooks.net/the-handmaid-tale-epub/
Reviewer:
RonPrice1
-
favoritefavoritefavoritefavorite -
December 8, 2013
Subject: Margaret Atwood: Some General Perspectives
Subject: Margaret Atwood: Some General Perspectives
The following are some personal comments on this famous Canadian writer. These comments do not constitute a review of this book but, rather, a general context for Atwood, a context that comes from my own reflections on her life and work.-Ron Price, Australia
-----------------------------
PINNING
Part 1:
Margaret Atwood, famous Canadian writer, said in an interview in 1978 when I was just beginning my literary and publishing life after 30 years of reading and writing as a student and teacher: “I began writing at the age of 5, but there was a dark period between the ages of 8 and 16 when I didn't write. I started again at 16. And have no idea why, but it was suddenly the only thing I wanted to do.”
My life-narrative with writing was very different from Atwood’s. I did not have the feeling that writing was “the only thing I wanted to do” until 1992, and insensibly and increasingly until I retired from teaching in 1999. By then I was 55, and I took a sea-change as they say in Australia.
Atwood also made the comment that in North America people have “a somewhat romantic notion about what an author is. They think of "writing" not as something you do but as something you are. The writer is seen as "expressing" herself; therefore, her books must be autobiographical. If the book were seen as something made, like a pot, we probably wouldn't have this difficulty.” As a North American, and until the age of 26 a resident of Canada, I hold some of this romantic view. As a person who has lived more than half his life in the Antipodes I see my writing a little like a pot, but only a little. I also have come to see it in many other perspectives.
Part 2:
Atwood went on to say: “My parents were great readers. They didn't encourage me to become a writer, exactly, but they gave me a more important kind of support; that is, they expected me to make use of my intelligence and abilities, but they did not pressure me in any particular direction. My mother was rather exceptional in this respect from what I can tell from the experiences of other young people my own age. Remember that all this was taking place in the 1950's, when marriage was seen as the only desirable goal for a girl, and parents pushed their kids this way and that.”
This could very well describe my parents. My mother, like Atwood’s, was a very lively person who would rather read poetry than scrub floors.My father scrubbed a lot of floors and did many things in life I scarcely appreciated back then when I was growing-up. -Ron Price with thanks to Margaret Atwood in “Margaret Atwood: Poet,” Joyce Carol Oats, New York Times on the Web, May 21st 1978.
I am absolutely dependent on the details
of the material world to make a space
for my prose-poetry to move around in.
It's dangerous to lift a statement out of
context, out of my poem, and take it as
my view, the poet’s view. The cultural
attitudes in poems are not invented by
poets; they’re reflections of something
the poet sees in the society around him.
Yeats once said that solitary imagination
makes and unmakes mankind and even the
world itself, for does not the 'eye alter
all'? Poetry is one of those things that
can't ever be quite pinned down....still
I do a lot of pinning...I’ve been pinning
for years, and I’ll be pinning for years.(1)
(1) Much of the above prose-poem is taken from an interview published in The New York Times seven months before I left Ballarat for Tasmania in December 1978. I had been living in Australia, at the time, for 7 and 1/2 years.
Ron Price
28/5/’06 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------
ATWOOD LUTHER AND ME
Margaret Atwood(1939- ) is a Canadian poet, novelist, literary critic, essayist, and environmental activist. She graduated from high school in Toronto the year I entered my last year of primary school in Burlington just 30 miles away: 1957. We are both war-babies or members of what some social scientists call the silent generation. Atwood was always about 5 years ahead of me since she was born at the start of the war, while I was born toward its end.
Considered by one generational descriptor as “cautious, unimaginative and withdrawn,” members of our generation, the war-babies, grew up in the late 1940s and 1950s at a time of social conformity and, “looking for a type of rebirth.”(1) This generation needed a cause. Both Atwood and I only fit some aspects of this generation descriptor. Yes, we both needed a cause. For me it became the Baha’i Faith. For Atwood the cause would seem to be environmental issues, among others. She is one of Canada’s most successful writers with more than a dozen volumes of poetry and 20 volumes of prose to her credit making her cause, in some ways, writing itself.
Atwood got her M.A. in 1962 in literature, the same year I finished my last year of hometown baseball, entered my last year of high school, and began my travelling-pioneering for the Canadian Baha’i community in the small town of Dundas Ontario. As my teaching career developed from primary, to secondary, to post-secondary levels, and as I travelled and worked from town to town in both Canada and Australia, in the late ‘60s and ‘70s, Atwood published book after book.
She was catapulted to celebrity status in 1972, the first year I left Canada and began living in Australia as an international pioneer from Canada, the year I helped establish the first locally elected Baha’i assembly in the steel-port city of Whyalla South Australia, and in western and central Australia outside of the capital cities.
Her book, Survival, provided for Canadians like myself a wonderful insight into Canadian literature and into our very sense of identity.(2)-Ron Price with thanks to (1) M. Nowak and D.T. Miller, The Fifties: The Way We Really Were, Doubleday & Co. Inc., N.Y. 1977, p.18; and (2)Joyce Carol Oates, “Margaret Atwood’s Tale,” The New York Review of Books, 2 November 2006.
Yes, Margaret Atwood, I liked
your characterization and your
leitmotifs of Canadians about a
sense of survival...not triumph
or victory, like the Americans,
and not about those who made it,
but those who made-it-back.....
I made it back, Margaret, from a
Baffin Island crash: ‘here I stand’
as Martin Luther said about half a
millennium ago at the outset of a
Protestant-German Reformation.(1)
(1) Luther is sometimes quoted as saying: "Here I stand. I can do no other". Recent scholars consider the evidence for these words to be unreliable, since they were inserted before "May God help me" only in later versions of the speech and not recorded in witness accounts of the proceedings. -Richard Marius, Luther, Quartet, London, 1975, p.155.
Ron Price
8/1/’12 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------------------
MY STORY IS DIFFERENT, MARGARET
The writer, the poet, is an observer, a witness, and such observations are the air they breathe. The poem, the writing, is a vehicle, for their human responsibility. It is a form of testament, a form of eye-witness account, an I-witnessing. The overall opus can often be said to comprise one story.
For Margaret Atwood it is what she calls the story of the disaster which is the world.(1) For Ron Price it is what he calls Pioneering Over Five Epochs. Ron Price with thanks to (1)Margaret Atwood in Women Writers: Margaret Atwood, Barbara Hill Rigney, Barnes and Noble Books, Totowa, NJ, 1987, p.17.
Yes, Margaret, there is pain, tragedy,
disaster, fatigue, fear and loathing in
this Age of Transition, & this eve of
destruction, in which I’ve played my
part. I’ve told it as I’ve seen it in
all these poems, Margaret, this border
country, this half light, and this new
generation of dawnbreaking, in this
burgeoning world of the dazzling &
the chaotic, in this waiting world, the
not-yet-arrived, the not here yet, the
dream and the reality, the beginnings,
chrysalis, the endless repetition, & the
hearing of the story and its meaning
again and again until it has dried out
your soul inside of despair’s bleached
skull, as Roger White put it long ago.
Of course, there’s a flip-side, Margaret;
one of vision, of hope, where one can
just about taste the fragrances, rich &
deep, with meaning. And now, a place
where the light of the countenance of God(1)
shines before me like a beacon in the night.
(1) Baha’u’llah, The Tablet of Carmel.
Ron Price
13/2/’99 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------------------
FULFILLING HIS TRUST
Margaret Atwood, Canadian author, explained how she wrote a series of poems that became The Journals of Susanna Moodie:(1) “They came as separate poems and I had no idea when I began that I was going to end up with a book of that size. It wasn’t planned that way. I wrote twelve at first and stopped and thought, you know, this is just short of a long short poem, twelve short poems, that’s it. And then I started writing more of them but I didn’t know where it was going. I don’t write books of poetry as books. I don’t write them like novels.”(2)
My poetry is similar to Atwood’s in terms of the process of writing. My pieces too “came as separate poems and I had no idea when I began that I was going to end up with a book”, or books of poems, the size or the extent to which I now have. “It wasn’t planned that way;” I wrote some 200 poems until the age of 47; of these I kept about 170. That’s about 5 poems a year from adolescence, the age of 13, to 47--35 years—or a poem every 75 days. Not exactly prolific.
“And then I started writing more of them in 1992, but I didn’t know where it was going.” In the years 1992 to 2013 I wrote some 7000++ poems. “I don’t write books of poetry as books. I don’t write them like novels.” I write a batch of about 100 and put them in a plastic binding and give them to some group, or just keep them in my study.-Ron Price with thanks to (1)Margaret Atwood, The Journals of Susanna Moodie, Oxford UP, Toronto, 1970; and (2)Margaret Atwood in Graeme Gibson, Eleven Canadian Novelists, Anansi, Toronto, 1972, p.164.
This is no novel but there’s
a central character, a story,
a set of ideas, a philosophy,
a serendipitous arrangement,
sequentially ordered with pattern
& images in a clear, an especially
modern, sensibility, in millions of
words all over cyberspace now, yes.
There’s a darker side to this persona,
this self in society and its exploration
is part of the trip, the journey through
a complex society and a new religion,
a series of coming to terms with people,
jobs, self, religion, the land, change---
as a tempest sweeps the face of the earth
in unpredictable, unprecedented ways.
After seeing little meaning in my world
around me at the start of my pioneering
journey in ’62, slowly, a union, vision,
past, present and future fell before my eyes,
insinuating, unobtrusive, with wonder,
awe, the foundation of the poetic me(1)
in a poem that is never finished and
helps me fulfil in my life His trust.(2)
(1) D. H. Lawrence quoted in The Psychic Mariner: A Reading of the Poems of D.H. Lawrence, Tom Marshall, Heinemann, London, 1970, p.3.
(2) Baha’u’llah, Hidden Words, p.1
Ron Price
18/9/'05 to 8/12/'13.
---------------------------------------
MORE TRUSTWORTHY?
Yesterday, while reading in the Launceston library I read some of a biography of Margaret Atwood. On the front page it read: Never trust biographies. Too many events in a man's life are invisible,as unknown to others as our dreams. The autobiographer, on the other hand, can tell of these invisible events and of his dreams and, to that extent, autobiographies are potentially more trustworthy.
My autobiography, spread over several genres, certainly tells of this invisible world, as best I can. It is my hope that it provides, not only a more trustworthy document but one that is a pleasure to read. -Ron Price with thanks to Anne Michaels in Margaret Atwood: A Biography, Nathalie Cooke, Ecw Press, Toronto, 1998, p.5
We need to feel we understand
the world we live in, making
sense of these our days with
a persuasive portrait of who
we are as people & what our
lives are or should be about---
Can it be recorded here?
Is this philosophico-religious
vision of reality, with answers
and values to live by a sign of
things to come. It seems that way
to me after 60 years of association.
This need,for some, is a cry of anguish.(1)
With others there seems to be no cry at all.
(1) Ayn Rand's philosophy
Ron Price
7/11/'01 to 8/12/'13.
-----------------------------------------
AMBIGUITY
Price’s poetic meanderings, his immersion in the process of defining his journey, is partly his way of discovering his past, his childhood, his ancestral roots, his psycho-history; partly his way of defining his identity, his complex personality, his many selves and what composed them; partly his way of giving form and substance to a religious conviction that had, in one way or another, consumed his life and given it meaning; and partly his way of giving expression to the relativity and multiplicity of truth’s many-coloured glass. -Ron Price with thanks to Margaret Atwood in Women Writers: Margaret Atwood, Barbara Hill Rigney, Barnes and Noble Books, Totowa, NJ, 1987.
Yes, Margaret, they defy classification:
men, women, ideas: grey, complicated,
multidimensional, like everything else.
Yet, we classify the ambiguous, the
inexact, the passionate waters, the
incorrigibly murky rivers of our days.
We strive for precision with our
fastidiousness and our disposition
to overcome the casual. With our
logic, our science, and in our desire
to sanitize our art we assault ambiguity
and create many universal definitions.
In the end, though, we are left with
the subtle, the allusive, and the
figurative, the nuances, the ironic,
the ambivalent, the handmaiden of
mysticism, a savoring of mystery:
ambiguity, the promoter of community
in our quest for meaning, our quest
beyond the univocal into a thousand
faces, a thousand voices, a thousand
eyes, and a billion-many meanings!!!
Ron Price
13/2/'99 to 8/12/'13
---------------------------------------
KEEPING IT IN
The novelists Iris Murdoch and Margaret Atwood(1) say that people need secrets. Secrets are a right and proper part of being human.The world today is obsessed with not having secrets, with letting it all hang out, with telling it all.
These two novelists argue that someone with no secrets is an impossibility. Beginning, perhaps, with St. Augustine, but certainly with the diarist Samuel Pepys in 1659-1669,(2) we find men and women who loved themselves and from a fullness of their knowledge they felt a love for others. They were curious about the world; with their eyes and ears wide open they observed the world. With a genuine and sometimes superficial gregariousness Pepys hid his secret, in a self-obsessed, hermetic existence.
The place where Pepys wrote was his Diary. He wrote for himself in such a delightfully frank way with a special zest to tell it all and with fresh observational details and a less than deep analysis.-Ron Price with thanks to (1) Helen Elliott, "The Sting in the Tale," The Australian: The Review, 3 March 2001, pp.4-5 and (2) Robert Louis Stevenson, "Modern History Sourcebook," Samuel Pepys, 1886.
You can't tell it all:
that's plain to see.
Not everything can
be disclosed.
It's better to keep it in
sometimes, the wise course,
the sensible middle,
a question of timing,
suited to the ears,
the sane line.
I've said this before.
I don't tell it all;
I keep some back,
just about all the time,
in poems and in life.
Ron Price
3/3/'01 to 8/12/'13
--------------------------
end of review, of this document
-----------------------------
PINNING
Part 1:
Margaret Atwood, famous Canadian writer, said in an interview in 1978 when I was just beginning my literary and publishing life after 30 years of reading and writing as a student and teacher: “I began writing at the age of 5, but there was a dark period between the ages of 8 and 16 when I didn't write. I started again at 16. And have no idea why, but it was suddenly the only thing I wanted to do.”
My life-narrative with writing was very different from Atwood’s. I did not have the feeling that writing was “the only thing I wanted to do” until 1992, and insensibly and increasingly until I retired from teaching in 1999. By then I was 55, and I took a sea-change as they say in Australia.
Atwood also made the comment that in North America people have “a somewhat romantic notion about what an author is. They think of "writing" not as something you do but as something you are. The writer is seen as "expressing" herself; therefore, her books must be autobiographical. If the book were seen as something made, like a pot, we probably wouldn't have this difficulty.” As a North American, and until the age of 26 a resident of Canada, I hold some of this romantic view. As a person who has lived more than half his life in the Antipodes I see my writing a little like a pot, but only a little. I also have come to see it in many other perspectives.
Part 2:
Atwood went on to say: “My parents were great readers. They didn't encourage me to become a writer, exactly, but they gave me a more important kind of support; that is, they expected me to make use of my intelligence and abilities, but they did not pressure me in any particular direction. My mother was rather exceptional in this respect from what I can tell from the experiences of other young people my own age. Remember that all this was taking place in the 1950's, when marriage was seen as the only desirable goal for a girl, and parents pushed their kids this way and that.”
This could very well describe my parents. My mother, like Atwood’s, was a very lively person who would rather read poetry than scrub floors.My father scrubbed a lot of floors and did many things in life I scarcely appreciated back then when I was growing-up. -Ron Price with thanks to Margaret Atwood in “Margaret Atwood: Poet,” Joyce Carol Oats, New York Times on the Web, May 21st 1978.
I am absolutely dependent on the details
of the material world to make a space
for my prose-poetry to move around in.
It's dangerous to lift a statement out of
context, out of my poem, and take it as
my view, the poet’s view. The cultural
attitudes in poems are not invented by
poets; they’re reflections of something
the poet sees in the society around him.
Yeats once said that solitary imagination
makes and unmakes mankind and even the
world itself, for does not the 'eye alter
all'? Poetry is one of those things that
can't ever be quite pinned down....still
I do a lot of pinning...I’ve been pinning
for years, and I’ll be pinning for years.(1)
(1) Much of the above prose-poem is taken from an interview published in The New York Times seven months before I left Ballarat for Tasmania in December 1978. I had been living in Australia, at the time, for 7 and 1/2 years.
Ron Price
28/5/’06 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------
ATWOOD LUTHER AND ME
Margaret Atwood(1939- ) is a Canadian poet, novelist, literary critic, essayist, and environmental activist. She graduated from high school in Toronto the year I entered my last year of primary school in Burlington just 30 miles away: 1957. We are both war-babies or members of what some social scientists call the silent generation. Atwood was always about 5 years ahead of me since she was born at the start of the war, while I was born toward its end.
Considered by one generational descriptor as “cautious, unimaginative and withdrawn,” members of our generation, the war-babies, grew up in the late 1940s and 1950s at a time of social conformity and, “looking for a type of rebirth.”(1) This generation needed a cause. Both Atwood and I only fit some aspects of this generation descriptor. Yes, we both needed a cause. For me it became the Baha’i Faith. For Atwood the cause would seem to be environmental issues, among others. She is one of Canada’s most successful writers with more than a dozen volumes of poetry and 20 volumes of prose to her credit making her cause, in some ways, writing itself.
Atwood got her M.A. in 1962 in literature, the same year I finished my last year of hometown baseball, entered my last year of high school, and began my travelling-pioneering for the Canadian Baha’i community in the small town of Dundas Ontario. As my teaching career developed from primary, to secondary, to post-secondary levels, and as I travelled and worked from town to town in both Canada and Australia, in the late ‘60s and ‘70s, Atwood published book after book.
She was catapulted to celebrity status in 1972, the first year I left Canada and began living in Australia as an international pioneer from Canada, the year I helped establish the first locally elected Baha’i assembly in the steel-port city of Whyalla South Australia, and in western and central Australia outside of the capital cities.
Her book, Survival, provided for Canadians like myself a wonderful insight into Canadian literature and into our very sense of identity.(2)-Ron Price with thanks to (1) M. Nowak and D.T. Miller, The Fifties: The Way We Really Were, Doubleday & Co. Inc., N.Y. 1977, p.18; and (2)Joyce Carol Oates, “Margaret Atwood’s Tale,” The New York Review of Books, 2 November 2006.
Yes, Margaret Atwood, I liked
your characterization and your
leitmotifs of Canadians about a
sense of survival...not triumph
or victory, like the Americans,
and not about those who made it,
but those who made-it-back.....
I made it back, Margaret, from a
Baffin Island crash: ‘here I stand’
as Martin Luther said about half a
millennium ago at the outset of a
Protestant-German Reformation.(1)
(1) Luther is sometimes quoted as saying: "Here I stand. I can do no other". Recent scholars consider the evidence for these words to be unreliable, since they were inserted before "May God help me" only in later versions of the speech and not recorded in witness accounts of the proceedings. -Richard Marius, Luther, Quartet, London, 1975, p.155.
Ron Price
8/1/’12 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------------------
MY STORY IS DIFFERENT, MARGARET
The writer, the poet, is an observer, a witness, and such observations are the air they breathe. The poem, the writing, is a vehicle, for their human responsibility. It is a form of testament, a form of eye-witness account, an I-witnessing. The overall opus can often be said to comprise one story.
For Margaret Atwood it is what she calls the story of the disaster which is the world.(1) For Ron Price it is what he calls Pioneering Over Five Epochs. Ron Price with thanks to (1)Margaret Atwood in Women Writers: Margaret Atwood, Barbara Hill Rigney, Barnes and Noble Books, Totowa, NJ, 1987, p.17.
Yes, Margaret, there is pain, tragedy,
disaster, fatigue, fear and loathing in
this Age of Transition, & this eve of
destruction, in which I’ve played my
part. I’ve told it as I’ve seen it in
all these poems, Margaret, this border
country, this half light, and this new
generation of dawnbreaking, in this
burgeoning world of the dazzling &
the chaotic, in this waiting world, the
not-yet-arrived, the not here yet, the
dream and the reality, the beginnings,
chrysalis, the endless repetition, & the
hearing of the story and its meaning
again and again until it has dried out
your soul inside of despair’s bleached
skull, as Roger White put it long ago.
Of course, there’s a flip-side, Margaret;
one of vision, of hope, where one can
just about taste the fragrances, rich &
deep, with meaning. And now, a place
where the light of the countenance of God(1)
shines before me like a beacon in the night.
(1) Baha’u’llah, The Tablet of Carmel.
Ron Price
13/2/’99 to 8/12/’13.
---------------------------------------------
FULFILLING HIS TRUST
Margaret Atwood, Canadian author, explained how she wrote a series of poems that became The Journals of Susanna Moodie:(1) “They came as separate poems and I had no idea when I began that I was going to end up with a book of that size. It wasn’t planned that way. I wrote twelve at first and stopped and thought, you know, this is just short of a long short poem, twelve short poems, that’s it. And then I started writing more of them but I didn’t know where it was going. I don’t write books of poetry as books. I don’t write them like novels.”(2)
My poetry is similar to Atwood’s in terms of the process of writing. My pieces too “came as separate poems and I had no idea when I began that I was going to end up with a book”, or books of poems, the size or the extent to which I now have. “It wasn’t planned that way;” I wrote some 200 poems until the age of 47; of these I kept about 170. That’s about 5 poems a year from adolescence, the age of 13, to 47--35 years—or a poem every 75 days. Not exactly prolific.
“And then I started writing more of them in 1992, but I didn’t know where it was going.” In the years 1992 to 2013 I wrote some 7000++ poems. “I don’t write books of poetry as books. I don’t write them like novels.” I write a batch of about 100 and put them in a plastic binding and give them to some group, or just keep them in my study.-Ron Price with thanks to (1)Margaret Atwood, The Journals of Susanna Moodie, Oxford UP, Toronto, 1970; and (2)Margaret Atwood in Graeme Gibson, Eleven Canadian Novelists, Anansi, Toronto, 1972, p.164.
This is no novel but there’s
a central character, a story,
a set of ideas, a philosophy,
a serendipitous arrangement,
sequentially ordered with pattern
& images in a clear, an especially
modern, sensibility, in millions of
words all over cyberspace now, yes.
There’s a darker side to this persona,
this self in society and its exploration
is part of the trip, the journey through
a complex society and a new religion,
a series of coming to terms with people,
jobs, self, religion, the land, change---
as a tempest sweeps the face of the earth
in unpredictable, unprecedented ways.
After seeing little meaning in my world
around me at the start of my pioneering
journey in ’62, slowly, a union, vision,
past, present and future fell before my eyes,
insinuating, unobtrusive, with wonder,
awe, the foundation of the poetic me(1)
in a poem that is never finished and
helps me fulfil in my life His trust.(2)
(1) D. H. Lawrence quoted in The Psychic Mariner: A Reading of the Poems of D.H. Lawrence, Tom Marshall, Heinemann, London, 1970, p.3.
(2) Baha’u’llah, Hidden Words, p.1
Ron Price
18/9/'05 to 8/12/'13.
---------------------------------------
MORE TRUSTWORTHY?
Yesterday, while reading in the Launceston library I read some of a biography of Margaret Atwood. On the front page it read: Never trust biographies. Too many events in a man's life are invisible,as unknown to others as our dreams. The autobiographer, on the other hand, can tell of these invisible events and of his dreams and, to that extent, autobiographies are potentially more trustworthy.
My autobiography, spread over several genres, certainly tells of this invisible world, as best I can. It is my hope that it provides, not only a more trustworthy document but one that is a pleasure to read. -Ron Price with thanks to Anne Michaels in Margaret Atwood: A Biography, Nathalie Cooke, Ecw Press, Toronto, 1998, p.5
We need to feel we understand
the world we live in, making
sense of these our days with
a persuasive portrait of who
we are as people & what our
lives are or should be about---
Can it be recorded here?
Is this philosophico-religious
vision of reality, with answers
and values to live by a sign of
things to come. It seems that way
to me after 60 years of association.
This need,for some, is a cry of anguish.(1)
With others there seems to be no cry at all.
(1) Ayn Rand's philosophy
Ron Price
7/11/'01 to 8/12/'13.
-----------------------------------------
AMBIGUITY
Price’s poetic meanderings, his immersion in the process of defining his journey, is partly his way of discovering his past, his childhood, his ancestral roots, his psycho-history; partly his way of defining his identity, his complex personality, his many selves and what composed them; partly his way of giving form and substance to a religious conviction that had, in one way or another, consumed his life and given it meaning; and partly his way of giving expression to the relativity and multiplicity of truth’s many-coloured glass. -Ron Price with thanks to Margaret Atwood in Women Writers: Margaret Atwood, Barbara Hill Rigney, Barnes and Noble Books, Totowa, NJ, 1987.
Yes, Margaret, they defy classification:
men, women, ideas: grey, complicated,
multidimensional, like everything else.
Yet, we classify the ambiguous, the
inexact, the passionate waters, the
incorrigibly murky rivers of our days.
We strive for precision with our
fastidiousness and our disposition
to overcome the casual. With our
logic, our science, and in our desire
to sanitize our art we assault ambiguity
and create many universal definitions.
In the end, though, we are left with
the subtle, the allusive, and the
figurative, the nuances, the ironic,
the ambivalent, the handmaiden of
mysticism, a savoring of mystery:
ambiguity, the promoter of community
in our quest for meaning, our quest
beyond the univocal into a thousand
faces, a thousand voices, a thousand
eyes, and a billion-many meanings!!!
Ron Price
13/2/'99 to 8/12/'13
---------------------------------------
KEEPING IT IN
The novelists Iris Murdoch and Margaret Atwood(1) say that people need secrets. Secrets are a right and proper part of being human.The world today is obsessed with not having secrets, with letting it all hang out, with telling it all.
These two novelists argue that someone with no secrets is an impossibility. Beginning, perhaps, with St. Augustine, but certainly with the diarist Samuel Pepys in 1659-1669,(2) we find men and women who loved themselves and from a fullness of their knowledge they felt a love for others. They were curious about the world; with their eyes and ears wide open they observed the world. With a genuine and sometimes superficial gregariousness Pepys hid his secret, in a self-obsessed, hermetic existence.
The place where Pepys wrote was his Diary. He wrote for himself in such a delightfully frank way with a special zest to tell it all and with fresh observational details and a less than deep analysis.-Ron Price with thanks to (1) Helen Elliott, "The Sting in the Tale," The Australian: The Review, 3 March 2001, pp.4-5 and (2) Robert Louis Stevenson, "Modern History Sourcebook," Samuel Pepys, 1886.
You can't tell it all:
that's plain to see.
Not everything can
be disclosed.
It's better to keep it in
sometimes, the wise course,
the sensible middle,
a question of timing,
suited to the ears,
the sane line.
I've said this before.
I don't tell it all;
I keep some back,
just about all the time,
in poems and in life.
Ron Price
3/3/'01 to 8/12/'13
--------------------------
end of review, of this document
7,738 Views
98 Favorites
DOWNLOAD OPTIONS
No suitable files to display here.
IN COLLECTIONS
Books for People with Print DisabilitiesUploaded by associate-angela-dugas on